Derek
Sun, 24 Aug 2008 18:03:00 GMT
Re: It's all a bit batty
Well along with the issue of Bats.. I actually used the web address posted re the bats and got straight to the report
You are such a sceptic what what will finally convince you that off the real issues...
Any way you are extremely useful to highlight the real counter truths of the debate.... I am now confident that the growing body of evidence is exposing the FACTs the Wind Energy Companies have known all along but chose to keep quiet about.
ohh I nearly forgot Im on this page to highlight the Downing St Petition....
even better oppose this site completely protect the abundance of wildlife and birds & bats that visit and nest hear.
Dont let the site be dug up and have tarmac roads, substation ,Pylons thousand tons of concrete...
also did you know that it is likely as with most wind farms that Enertrag will want more turbines if you think its only 8
then you could be in for a nasty surprise.... But then again and I make no apologies for this comment ,we are dealing with NASTY PEOPLE..... who say there are no wild life issues when the surveys havent be published..
They say that the RAF have no issues with this location when I have a letter from the RAF disputing this statement...
I will expose Enertrags mis representations and give you real FACTs as they come to light
Melvin
--- Melvin(guest)
Taking me good friend John Wards advice. 'it's all about syntax'... are you the same Melvin? I apologise if you are, but that post didn't follow the 'syntax' of the Chairmans other posts.
P.S. I noticed you avoided my question of if there were any migratory paths of bats around here?